Source: University of Oxford Libguide
See also The Court System in England and Wales, which includes the ECJ, ECHR, Ecclesiastical Courts, and Courts Martial.
The Supreme Court website includes links to:
When the Court is sitting, you can view live footage of the hearings via the Supreme Court Live website.
The Supreme Court's Video on Demand website provides footage of complete trial proceedings in decided cases, including arguments and judgments. These are loaded onto the site as soon as the judgment is handed down, and are available for one year.
The Supreme Court's Youtube channel shows five minute summaries of judgments, delivered by the lead Judge. The Justices’ summaries aim to explain briefly the background to the appeal in hand, the decision the court has reached, and the reasons for that decision.
Before the Human Rights Act was passed by Parliament in 1998 it was not possible for an individual in the UK to challenge a decision of a public authority on the grounds that it violated his or her rights under the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR), within the courts of the UK. Individuals instead had to take their case directly to the European Court of Human Rights in Strasbourg (ECtHR).
Once the Human Rights Act came into force on 2 October 2000, individuals could claim a remedy for breaches of the Convention rights in the UK courts. An individual who thinks that his or her Convention rights have not been respected by a decision of a UK court may still bring a claim before the ECtHR, but they must first try their appeal in the UK courts.
It is the duty of all such courts, including the UK Supreme Court, to interpret all existing legislation so that it is compatible with the ECHR; so far as it is possible to do so. If the court decides it is not possible to interpret legislation so that it is compatible with the Convention it will issue a 'declaration of incompatibility'.
Although a declaration of incompatibility does not place any legal obligation on the government to amend or repeal legislation, it sends a clear message to legislators that they should change the law to make it compatible with the human rights set out in the Convention. In giving effect to rights contained in the ECHR the Court must take account of any decision of the ECtHR in Strasbourg. No national court should "without strong reason dilute or weaken the effect of the Strasbourg case law" (Lord Bingham of Cornhill in R (Ullah) v Special Adjudicator  UKHL 26).
Source: The UK Supreme Court website
Link to the European Court of Human Rights website.
References to reported cases often include an abbreviation of the report series title. You can use these tools to find the meaning of an abbreviation:
Cases in the Court of Appeal have always retained the order of the parties at first instance ie: Plaintiff/Claimant v Defendant, regardless of which was the appellant or respondent.
In the case of appeals to the House of Lords (now the Supreme Court), prior to 1974, the appellant was always named first regardless of whether they had been the plaintiff or defendant at first instance. In 1974, this position was changed so that the order of the parties remains the same throughout (see Practice Direction (House of Lords: Case Title)  1 WLR 305, and sections 2.1.18 to 2.1.22 under the heading Case Title of the Supreme Court Practice Direction No.2).
For more detailed information on finding historical cases, see the Legal History Research Guide.
The Proceedings of the Old Bailey, 1674-1913, a fully searchable website of criminal cases held at London's central criminal court.
See also this guide for accessing Trials in the Old Bailey and the Central Criminal Court produced by The National Archives.
The SOAS Library has produced a useful brief introduction to Understanding UK Case Law, which includes information on reported and unreported cases, why decisions are reported, and how to cite and read a case.
Reports prior to 1865
Reports published between 1537 and 1865 are referred to as nominate reports and are published under the name of the reporter (eg. Coke's Reports, Simons, Beavan, etc.). Many of the nominate reports have been complied and reprinted. The first reprint is the Revised Reports (RR) and the subsequent (and preferred) reprint is the English Reports (ER).
When citing nominate reports, you should also include a parallel citation of the English Reports (or the Revised Reports) where available.
The Revised Reports and English Reports are available in print and online - check the library catalogue.
Reports after 1865
The Official Law Reports (Appeals Cases, Queen's Bench, Chancery, Family) published by the Incorporated Council of Law Reporting for England and Wales are the authorised reports.
Where a judgment has not (or not yet) been reported in the Official Law Reports, but has been reported in the Weekly Law Reports (W.L.R.) or All England Law Reports (All ER), then this report should be cited.
Where a judgment has not been reported in the Official Law Reports, Weekly Law Reports or All England Reports but has been reported in an authoritative specialist series of reports, this report should be cited.
Where a judgment has not been reported in any of the report series above but has been reported in other reports, this report should be cited.
A practice direction on citation of authorities has been released by the Judiciary of England and Wales.
This is a list of some of the report series available through the Law Library. For a complete list, check the Library catalogue.
* = authorised report series
*The English Reports (contains reprints of the Nominate Reports)
*The Law Reports (Appeal Cases, Kings Bench, Queens Bench, Family Chancery, Probate, etc.)
All England Law Reports
The Weekly Law Reports
Lloyds Law Reports
Times Law Reports
Butterworths Company Law Cases
British Company Cases
Family Court Report
Family Law Reports
Fleet Street Reports
Industrial Cases Reports
Reports of Patent, Design and Trade Mark Cases
Reports of Tax Cases
Simon's Tax Cases
Tip: multiple UK law report series and unreported judgments can be searched simultaneously in Lexis, Westlaw UK and Justis.
Unreported judgments are cases that have been heard in the courts that have been published but have not been reported in a law report series. Unreported cases are available faster than reports. Unreported cases may be subsequently reported.
Unreported Judgments are available through:
To find cases on a particular topic, use the following tools:
BAILII caselaw searches are available as RSS feeds. When you perform a search, you will see the RSS feed icon on the results page. Click on the RSS Feed for this Search text next to the orange icon icon and copy the url link into your RSS reader - you will then be notified whenever new decisions that match your search terms are aded to BAILLI.
Use the Westlaw UK Legislation tab:
To see if a case has been considered by other cases, use the following tools:
You can set up an RSS feed on BAILLI, so that every time a case cites your case, you will be notified. When you find your case in BAILII, you'll see the RSS icon at the top of the results page - click on this icon and paste the feed url into your feed reader.
WARNING: if you actually click on the link to the decision itself from the search results page, you will NOT see an rss option - you have to set up the feed from the search results page, which means you have to find the exact case you're looking for and only have that one case on the search results page.
For more information on setting up alerts for UK cases, see the UK menu item on the CASES tab in the Keeping up to Date research Guide. For more information on RSS feeds, see the RSS Feeds and Email Alerts tab on the Keeping up to Date research Guide.
To find whether section of legislation has been considered by the courts, use the following search tools:
Tip: search the legislation title as a phrase.