This page outlines the basic keyword search techniques and more advanced options you can use to improve your searching
Develop a search strategy that balances the need to find sufficient studies and/or concepts with the time and resources at disposal.
When putting together an exhaustive search, it is important to find a balance between being able to find everything within an electronic source and finding exactly what is desired. To be exhaustive there need to be a broad search strategy with many search terms and many different sources consulted. This will increase the number of relevant studies identified (sensitivity), but also increase the number of studies once screened turns out not to be relevant. Searches with more precision retrieves fewer irrelevant studies compared to relevant studies.
Keep a balance between (1) searching sensitively for a high proportion of total relevant as well as irrelevant items to screen, and (2) searching precisely to include a high proportion of studies to meet the inclusion criteria with the risk of losing relevant studies.
Many databases offer the ability to search for phrases such as "parent involvement". Check if the particular database can process both truncation and phrase searches accurately within the one search statement.
Often proximity searching is also supported (e.g. NEAR, or WITHIN) - which help to specify the relationship between two words within one search field. Employing proximity searching often results in higher sensitivity than phrase searching, but greater precision than the AND operator.
Joining all possible keywords, controlled terms, synonyms and related terms with the OR operator, means articles retrieved contains at least ONE of these terms.
A string joined by OR can be built for each of 'population', 'condition', 'intervention', 'outcome', etc.
Each string can then be joined by the AND operator - limiting the retrieved articles to studies addressing all of those conditions. **if only ONE of those conditions are not met, the article will be excluded from the results.**
The NOT operator should be used with caution. Use of NOT could lead to inadvertently removing relevant items from the results.
Ebscohost databases | effective N5 teach* |
Proquest databases | effective N/5 teach* |
Informit databases | "effective teaching"~5 |
OVID databases | effective ADJ5 teach* |
Advantage | Disadvantage | |
Controlled vocabulary |
|
|
Keywords |
|
|
The link below takes you to a new window
Gough, D., Oliver, S., & Thomas, J. (2017). An introduction to systematic reviews (2nd ed.). Sage.
Harzing, A.-W. (2017). Using Publish or Perish to do a literature review [Blog post]. https://harzing.com/blog/2017/02/using-publish-or-perish-to-do-a-literature-review
Kugley S, Wade A, Thomas J, Mahood Q, Jørgensen AMK, Hammerstrøm K, Sathe N. Searching for studies: A guide to information retrieval for Campbell Systematic Reviews. Campbell Methods Guides 2016:1
https://doi.org/10.4073/cmg.2016.1
McGrath, J. M., Brown, R. E., & Samra, H. A. (2012). Before you search the literature: How to prepare and get the most out of citation databases. Newborn and Infant Nursing Reviews, 12(3), 162-170. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.nainr.2012.06.003