Skip to Main Content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Systematic Reviews

An introduction to systematic reviews, with examples from health sciences and medicine

Critical Appraisal

Critical appraisal is the process of judging the validity and quality of a research paper.

Major points to consider when appraising systematic reviews include:

  • Is the study valid?

  • What are the results, and are they significant?

  • Are the results applicable?

Critical Appraisal Tools

The PRISMA checklist is also helpful in identifying elements to look for in a systematic review, although it is not a quality instrument per se; the SPIRIT checklist likewise.

Critical Appraisal + Data extraction

Data extraction is the process of transcribing information from the  primary studies under review to a standard form or template that has been designed to capture all of the detail relevant to the meta-analysis.

Double data extraction is preferred for accuracy - this is when two researchers extract the data independently and discuss any discrepancies or consult a moderator to arrive at consensus.

Text on Critical Appraisal