Comparative Effectiveness Reviews are systematic reviews of existing research on the effectiveness, comparative effectiveness, and harms of different health care interventions. They provide syntheses of relevant evidence to inform real-world health care decisions for patients, providers, and policymakers (Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews, 2008)
Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Full Text
Tsertsvadze, A., Maglione, M., Chou, R., Garritty, C., Coleman, C., Lux, L., ... & Moher, D. (2011). Updating comparative effectiveness reviews: current efforts in AHRQ's Effective Health Care Program. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 64(11), 1208-1215. Full Text
Glick, S. B., Samson, D. J., Huang, E. S., Vats, V., Aronson, N., & Weber, S. G. (2014). Screening for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a comparative effectiveness review. American journal of infection control, 42(2), 148-155. Full Text
References
Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2008 Full Text